News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is the Linux Desktop less secure than Windows 10? [pdf] by throwanem on Monday February 06, 2017 @08:23AM (#13579165)
If the third-party thumbnailer is implemented as a shared library (DLL) that Explorer is configured to load, then sure, a segfault or similar in the library will kill the whole process. Not sure how that's Microsoft's fault. Sure, there's an argument that loading a library is the wrong model, but there's a performance tradeoff, especially given Windows' relatively slow IPC capabilities. The real surprise here is that Linux manages to be comparably slow, but when you complicate a simple, fast IPC model with dbus and a million other middleware layers, I suppose it starts to make more sense.
Re:Is the Linux Desktop less secure than Windows 10? [pdf] by josteink on Monday February 06, 2017 @08:29AM (#13579199)
I'm not excusing the Linux implementation for being slow, which I agree it sometimes is (Hello Dropbox and my huge, flat "Camera uploads" folder...).

I'm just saying that I've seen bad things happen on Windows too. Not blaming Microsoft, just saying that in a typical end-user scenario with lots of randomly installed software, you will have Explorer break too.

Basically the grass is rotten everywhere :)