Tunable eyeglass lenses to replace bifocals

Re:Tunable eyeglass lenses to replace bifocals by derekp7 on Sunday February 05, 2017 @02:36PM (#13574098)

Problem is, the topic itself may be worthy of discussion -- but then you limit the people involved in the discussion (who have read the article) only to those who have a subscription to that given site.

What would be more useful is, where possible, post a non-paywall link, to maximize the number of potential participants in the discussion. An alternative in cases where the paywall link is the primary source, is to post a summary in a comment. But then you risk having the editorial slant of the summary be tilted towards whoever wrote up the summary.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tunable eyeglass lenses to replace bifocals by maxerickson on Sunday February 05, 2017 @03:22PM (#13574387)

I think it's maybe a little optimistic to assume that only people that read an article will brave a comment.

And even so, is it that big a problem if subscribers to some publication are the ones that can make an interesting comment about an article? Where's the downside to hosting that discussion?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Tunable eyeglass lenses to replace bifocals by Dylan16807 on Sunday February 05, 2017 @04:41PM (#13574804)

An article has to be pretty special in quality for that level of exclusion to be worth using it instead of a similar article elsewhere.

[ Parent | on HN ]