News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Snap Inc. S-1. Parent comment

Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by scarmig on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:03PM (#13555811)
Oracle is spending way more than 2 billion dollars on its cloud team in an attempt to catch up to AWS, GCP, and Azure.

Would you consider Oracle's cloud endeavor a fair test of how able a company is to reproduce GCP's offering with a fistful of money?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by beamatronic on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:53PM (#13556247)
What I can't figure out is why Oracle didn't start down this road 10-20 years ago. They more than anyone should have some ideas about scaling infrastructure for databases.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by dreamfactory2 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @09:13PM (#13557064)
sales led, not strategic, and it would have cannibalised their existing money printing machine. imagine if they started offering their customers PAYG elastic accounts rather than multi year mega provisioning deals - their numbers would have been destroyed
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Snap Inc. S-1 by throwaway2048 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:09PM (#13555863)
Oracle is offering external services, that is a huge differentiating factor
[ Parent | on HN ]