Re:Snap Inc. S-1
by doubleorseven on Thursday February 02, 2017 @05:10PM
(#13555278)
Just to clarify your answer, here is another thing Google won't tell you: once you build yourself in their cloud you will have to find something else to do with all the time you used to spend on latency.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1
by brandon272 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @08:40PM
(#13556916)
Why won't Google tell you that?
Oracle is spending way more than 2 billion dollars on its cloud team in an attempt to catch up to AWS, GCP, and Azure.
Would you consider Oracle's cloud endeavor a fair test of how able a company is to reproduce GCP's offering with a fistful of money?
Re:Snap Inc. S-1
by beamatronic on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:53PM
(#13556247)
What I can't figure out is why Oracle didn't start down this road 10-20 years ago. They more than anyone should have some ideas about scaling infrastructure for databases.
Re:Snap Inc. S-1
by dreamfactory2 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @09:13PM
(#13557064)
sales led, not strategic, and it would have cannibalised their existing money printing machine. imagine if they started offering their customers PAYG elastic accounts rather than multi year mega provisioning deals - their numbers would have been destroyed
Re:Snap Inc. S-1
by throwaway2048 on Thursday February 02, 2017 @06:09PM
(#13555863)
Oracle is offering external services, that is a huge differentiating factor
edit: I should point out that this doesn't account for ramp-up. It would obviously take awhile before things would be to a point where it would be even comparable.