News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Reuters' position on covering Trump. Parent comment

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by maxerickson on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @06:32PM (#13546530)
The waiver for Secretary Mattis, a couple of bills that appear to be quite minor (I only skimmed them for a second):

https://www.congress.gov/public-laws/115th-congress

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by mikeash on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @06:43PM (#13546598)
Thanks. I didn't realize it was so easy to look up. Obvious in retrospect.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by maxerickson on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @06:55PM (#13546679)
My secret agenda was a PSA that they do a pretty good job publishing that stuff.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by mikeash on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @07:26PM (#13546887)
It worked!
[ Parent | on HN ]