Reuters' position on covering Trump

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by mikeash on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @05:37PM (#13546098)

I seem to recall Obama passing a rather major health care reform. Trump hasn't done anything nearly that big yet.

What you describe as a "lean and agile approach to legislation" appears to be not bothering with legislation at all. Has there been any legislation passed during the Trump administration yet? I certainly haven't heard of anything big.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by maxerickson on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @06:32PM (#13546530)

The waiver for Secretary Mattis, a couple of bills that appear to be quite minor (I only skimmed them for a second):

https://www.congress.gov/public-laws/115th-congress

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by mikeash on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @06:43PM (#13546598)

Thanks. I didn't realize it was so easy to look up. Obvious in retrospect.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by maxerickson on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @06:55PM (#13546679)

My secret agenda was a PSA that they do a pretty good job publishing that stuff.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by mikeash on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @07:26PM (#13546887)

It worked!

[ Parent | on HN ]