Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump
by VLM on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @02:32PM
(#13544128)
HN being an unobjective far left echo chamber is not new, making the stories kind of tiresome propaganda.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump
by matthewmacleod on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @02:57PM
(#13544414)
HN being full of clichè dissenting know-it-alls is not new, either.
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump
by AnimalMuppet on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @05:11PM
(#13545873)
To the contrary. The signal-to-noise ratio here is not as good as I would like, but I can still find reasoned, thoughtful comments from people who don't think like me. It's still better than almost anywhere else.