News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Reuters' position on covering Trump. Parent comment

Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by RickS on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @02:07PM (#13543833)
>some interesting new phenomenon

There's a case to be made that much of today's politics are interesting new phenomenons.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by VLM on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @02:32PM (#13544128)
HN being an unobjective far left echo chamber is not new, making the stories kind of tiresome propaganda.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by matthewmacleod on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @02:57PM (#13544414)
HN being full of clichè dissenting know-it-alls is not new, either.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Reuters' position on covering Trump by AnimalMuppet on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @05:11PM (#13545873)
To the contrary. The signal-to-noise ratio here is not as good as I would like, but I can still find reasoned, thoughtful comments from people who don't think like me. It's still better than almost anywhere else.
[ Parent | on HN ]