News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Million requests per second with Python by tuyguntn on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @07:24AM (#13540148)
Django needs this kind of performance boost, without depending on gunicorn/uwsgi servers
Re:Million requests per second with Python by xyzzy123 on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @08:59AM (#13540709)
Nothing will save django for free because if you used that your most likely real problem is scaling postgres or mysql.

Use as many appservers as your customer base will pay you for.

Basically, cry in your beer because you're so rich and successful now that the framework won't handle your stuff.

Re:Million requests per second with Python by scriptkiddy on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @11:33AM (#13542119)
Agreed. Scaling Django isn't difficult really. Just spin up another instance if you need to. The major problem is scaling the DB. Making sure you're not bogging Postgres down by making it have to deal with possible race conditions is difficult.
Re:Million requests per second with Python by Notre1 on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @07:55AM (#13540307)
Why would you prefer to depend on this (Japronto), instead of Gunicorn or uWSGI?
Re:Million requests per second with Python by burnbabyburn on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @08:14AM (#13540440)
I don't thing for now those are comparable, uWsgi is a LOT more than what a 0.1 release is.
Re:Million requests per second with Python by est on Wednesday February 01, 2017 @11:09AM (#13541828)
uWSGI has very decent HTTP/1.1 performance

http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/HTTP.html