News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:C# functional language extensions and Erlang-like concurr... by catnaroek on Monday January 30, 2017 @07:00PM (#13526213)
That just shows that the result of specializing the monad laws to one specific type constructor, holds. But the monad laws themselves are inexpressible in a general form.

If you can't even postulate a theory (the monad signature and its equational laws), it doesn't make sense to talk about what models of the theory exist (concrete instances).

There are no comments on this comment yet.