Re:Study Finds Uber Doesn’t Put Taxi Drivers Out of Work But...
by becarefulyo on Sunday January 29, 2017 @10:05PM
(#13518346)
They should require larger vehicles. Cramming three people into the back of a compact sucks.
Re:Study Finds Uber Doesn’t Put Taxi Drivers Out of Work But...
by twblalock on Sunday January 29, 2017 @11:28PM
(#13518665)
If you don't like it, don't take the least expensive level of Uber service. Uber has already segmented the market to provide more space and luxury to those willing to pay for it. Take Uber X, or Uber, or Uber Black.
Re:Study Finds Uber Doesn’t Put Taxi Drivers Out of Work But...
by MarkMc on Sunday January 29, 2017 @11:55PM
(#13518796)
I think becarefulyo's point was that Uber hasn't segmented the market enough. There needs to be a pool-without-cramming option. If Uber doesn't provide it, someone else will.
Re:Study Finds Uber Doesn’t Put Taxi Drivers Out of Work But...
by legodt on Sunday January 29, 2017 @11:34PM
(#13518701)
Interesting, but the argument has always been that x is Uber's Netflix DVD phase. Uber black car was the DVD phase for UberX, UberX was the DVD phase for Uber pool, and, now, Uber pool is the DVD phase for fully automating the driver out of the picture. It's certainly an interesting strategy to watch unfold. It's reasonable to assume that Uber black car very deliberately was a stepping stone to the more accessible UberX, but what I want to know is if during the initial pitch meetings they had any idea that their game was to burn money/remain solvent as long as they possibly can in order to have an upper hand in the future self-driving market.
1. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shortest_path_problem