Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by paulddraper on Friday January 27, 2017 @09:41PM
(#13504534)
An unconstitutional act is void.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by rhizome on Friday January 27, 2017 @10:01PM
(#13504623)
If you're talking about NSLs, they've been found constitutional for almost a year now. Still time to buy that first birthday gift!
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/04/in-a-reversal-ju...
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by paulddraper on Saturday January 28, 2017 @12:04AM
(#13505015)
Sure, I'm just saying that there aren't legal repercussions from violating an unconditional act.
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by techbio on Saturday January 28, 2017 @05:23AM
(#13505705)
Illegal repercussions then?
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters
by paulddraper on Saturday January 28, 2017 @09:12AM
(#13506337)
Um, sure. If no one watches the watchers.