News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters by paulddraper on Friday January 27, 2017 @09:41PM (#13504534)
An unconstitutional act is void.
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters by rhizome on Friday January 27, 2017 @10:01PM (#13504623)
If you're talking about NSLs, they've been found constitutional for almost a year now. Still time to buy that first birthday gift!

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/04/in-a-reversal-ju...

Re:Twitter discloses national security letters by paulddraper on Saturday January 28, 2017 @12:04AM (#13505015)
Sure, I'm just saying that there aren't legal repercussions from violating an unconditional act.
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters by techbio on Saturday January 28, 2017 @05:23AM (#13505705)
Illegal repercussions then?
Re:Twitter discloses national security letters by paulddraper on Saturday January 28, 2017 @09:12AM (#13506337)
Um, sure. If no one watches the watchers.