News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by agumonkey on Friday January 27, 2017 @06:12AM (#13499071)
I .. feel the same. Which conflicts me a lot because he's despicable in many dimensions. But he'll act as the wall(sic) we'll hit to react. He's driven and polarizing, even in the worst sense of the term.. that's still "coherent energy".

ps: that said, I can't wait for the U.S to kick him out.. he seems unfit to do anything.

Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by raverbashing on Friday January 27, 2017 @07:33AM (#13499359)
Just a note, that's not how you use (sic)

It's usually used when quoting an original statement that's doubtful or knowingly incorrect

I don't know which term would be more appropriate to use, probably "pun intended"

Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by agumonkey on Friday January 27, 2017 @08:57AM (#13499786)
True, but even Wikipedia lists irony as a usage https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sic#The_.22ironic_use.22_of_si...
Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by raverbashing on Friday January 27, 2017 @09:01AM (#13499805)
Good, I assume that was the writer's intention then
Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by theandrewbailey on Friday January 27, 2017 @09:15AM (#13499882)
Isn't "(sic)" used to mark a misspelling in the original material? That's all I've ever seen it used for.
Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by baq on Friday January 27, 2017 @05:23PM (#13503259)
it literally means 'so it was written' or something similar. wikipedia:

"The Latin adverb sic ("thus"; "just as"; in full: sic erat scriptum, "thus was it written")[1] inserted after a quoted word or passage, indicates that the quoted matter has been transcribed exactly as found in the source text, complete with any erroneous or archaic spelling, surprising assertion, faulty reasoning, or other matter that might otherwise be taken as an error of transcription." (sic)

Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by vixen99 on Friday January 27, 2017 @07:57AM (#13499473)
Rants are totally uninformative (whatever your political persuasion) and there's a channel for them on Reddit (I gather). How is your comment related to 'Trump order, could nix EU-US data flows'?
Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by reddytowns on Friday January 27, 2017 @06:14AM (#13499079)
I think he's awesome for those very same reasons
Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by agumonkey on Friday January 27, 2017 @06:18AM (#13499092)
awesome ? you value selfish antagonism if it ends up as a (potentially) global positive outcome ?
Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by ttrmw on Friday January 27, 2017 @06:57AM (#13499224)
I personally feel the risk in this instance is too high, but as a rule, yes.
Re:Trump order strips privacy rights from non-U.S. citizens by agumonkey on Friday January 27, 2017 @07:06AM (#13499257)
As an engineer I've learned to appreciate counter intuitive strategies and laws but as you said... the desired outcomes seem unlikely here.