News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:First they came for the Iranians by morsch on Thursday January 26, 2017 @03:35PM (#13495037)
What exactly in the article are you referring to? He -- a former supreme court judge of one of the German states, not of Germany -- doesn't outright claim anything illegal was done.

He sort of, fairly timidly, questions it, with the flimsiest of legal analogies: the legislature has to agree to military missions, e.g. participation in UN missions, and thus (?!) something something Merkel. It's a complete non-sequitur.

Re:First they came for the Iranians by tiatia on Thursday January 26, 2017 @06:44PM (#13496477)
Re:First they came for the Iranians by chronial on Thursday January 26, 2017 @08:55PM (#13497117)
That link is just a copy of this original article: http://info.kopp-verlag.de/hintergruende/deutschland/udo-ulf....

Now if you look into this Kopp Verlag, you will find that the Verfassungsschutz is keeping an eye on them because they might be spreading right-wing ideology which seeks to overthrow the constitutional structure of Germany.

Interesting source for claims of unconstitutional behavior by Merkel ^^.

Now I'm not saying that any of this necessarily makes what they say untrue, but I guess your choice of sources makes one thing clear: Nobody here will be able to convince you.

Re:First they came for the Iranians by morsch on Friday January 27, 2017 @05:25AM (#13498896)
Well, you found an actual federal judge that wrote an actual paper, even if you linked to some third rate news source instead.

Here's the paper: http://bayern.de/Gutachten_Prof_Di_Fabio

Here's a rebuttal: http://verfassungsblog.de/dem-freistaat-zum-gefallen-ueber-u...