News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on C++11 FAQ. Parent comment

Re:C++11 FAQ by cbsmith on Thursday January 26, 2017 @01:23PM (#13493812)
Odd. I wonder why they didn't just use Boost uBLAS or similar.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C++11 FAQ by claudius on Thursday January 26, 2017 @03:41PM (#13495073)
Last time I checked, Boost uBLAS was horribly slow and one should not use it. Use Eigen or Blitz++ (or just call BLAS directly) instead.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:C++11 FAQ by cbsmith on Friday January 27, 2017 @02:29AM (#13498316)
That's what I meant... Though Boost uBLAS is still way faster than a deeply inherited 4x4 matrix...
[ Parent | on HN ]