Re:Doomsday Clock Moves Closer to Midnight
by mschaef on Thursday January 26, 2017 @01:21PM
(#13493795)
> a parent who has made some threat that they never intended to carry through, counting 1, 2, 2-and-a-half, 2-and-three-quarters...
As a parent, I've taken this through as far as 2 and 255/256. (Although by that point it had changed from a threat to a math lesson.)
Re:Doomsday Clock Moves Closer to Midnight
by rconti on Thursday January 26, 2017 @01:27PM
(#13493856)
Is that what finally got them to behave? "Noooooooo!!!! Anything but math!!!"
Re:Doomsday Clock Moves Closer to Midnight
by bjt2n3904 on Thursday January 26, 2017 @01:06PM
(#13493646)
IIRC, the Doomsday Clock was about nuclear war. If we're including "climate change", what other things should we include?
Re:Doomsday Clock Moves Closer to Midnight
by nagvx on Thursday January 26, 2017 @01:16PM
(#13493754)
>represented an analogy for the threat of global nuclear war; however, since 2007 it has also reflected climate change,[4] and new developments in the life sciences and technology that could inflict irrevocable harm to humanity.[5]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_Clock
It has been this way for nearly a decade. It's also plausible that they are linked - climate change destroying natural resources (land, food, etc.) certainly has the potential to inflict political instability and conflict.
If you have such a long established tradition of using "minutes" as some kind of metaphor for upcoming doom, it doesn't feel meaningful to suddenly start talking about half-minutes.