News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Lessons Learned from “On Writing Well” by jimmaswell on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @08:03PM (#13487854)
I don't see anything wrong with the sentence besides maybe the use of "front" that you pointed out. I got it easily the first time reading it and I'm certain it would be just as clear to me spoken as long as I was paying attention.
Re:Lessons Learned from “On Writing Well” by AckSyn on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @08:16PM (#13487913)
I remember this story and the only (personal preference) issue I can take with it were the comma placements. Yikes. Shatner anyone?
Re:Lessons Learned from “On Writing Well” by Veen on Thursday January 26, 2017 @05:34AM (#13490234)
Commas have two roles: syntactic and prosodic. Today, we almost always use them to indicate syntax: separating subclauses etc.

In the nineteenth century, they were commonly used to indicate prosody — breathing pauses and the intended rhythm of the sentence — which leads to comma placements that seem odd to modern eyes but would have been perfectly normal to a nineteenth-century reader. If you read any Jane Austen, George Eliot, or other Victorian writers, you'll see that sort of usage everywhere:

> "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife."

Re:Lessons Learned from “On Writing Well” by SNACKeR99 on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @11:44PM (#13488807)
I think the commas very well placed. If it reads like Shatner to you, then perhaps you are reading as if they were ellipses?