News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Firefox 51.0 by StRoy on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @04:34AM (#13480024)
> I thought Chrome was famous for being a resource hog.

That's only in comparison to Safari and Edge. If you open enough tabs to cause memory issues on Chrome, Firefox would have frozen and slowed down to a crawl before filling the memory, anyhow, and electrolysis still isn't in a state where it could change that: there's still one process for the renderer so if enough intensive webpages are run your web browsing experience will still slow down.

Re:Firefox 51.0 by scholia on Wednesday January 25, 2017 @09:13AM (#13481458)
That's not what I find. How are you measuring memory use?