I Had My Electronics Seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Re:I Had My Electronics Seized by U.S. Customs and Border Pr... by adventured on Sunday January 22, 2017 @02:14PM (#13456692)

Obama had very few good social policies. One could argue he slightly stepped back the enforcement of drug laws when it comes to the states beginning to legalize. He did a horrible job when it comes to drug legalization, openly refusing to go to bat for it at the Federal level. The ACA was a disaster (of course it was, it was a zillion pages long, written by lobbyists, and few people read it before it was voted on), except for a few features such as coverage for pre-existing conditions. He didn't make almost any real progress on US problems with mass incarceration either, although he talked about it a few times. He was against gay marriage initially, then flipped when it was politically convenient; the Supreme Court was responsible for enacting that equality at the federal level however. He was also a massive civil liberties violator, when it came to privacy and was openly unapologetic about it (he was clearly an anti-privacy hawk in all regards). In short, yeah, he didn't do much of anything socially.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Had My Electronics Seized by U.S. Customs and Border Pr... by chowyuncat on Sunday January 22, 2017 @03:56PM (#13457410)

There was far more than talk, although it's difficult to enact reform when the legislative branch is determined to do nothing. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-record/social-progr...

Scroll down to "The Work Ahead."

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2014/07/21/preside... https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2015/04/08/petitio... https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/memora... https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/1...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Had My Electronics Seized by U.S. Customs and Border Pr... by bluejekyll on Sunday January 22, 2017 @11:36PM (#13459797)

Yes, worth reminding people that the President's job is only to enforce and enact law. Whereas Congress is the only body allowed to create law, i.e. bills. And the Judiciary interprets the law.

Obama could only enact laws that congress passed, and they pretty much only did that his first two years until Congress became a logjam and stopped doing anything. So Obama was left with the only tools he had, which were to enforce those laws he wanted to, and not the one he did not. And he did a lot of that, as pointed out.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Had My Electronics Seized by U.S. Customs and Border Pr... by antognini on Monday January 23, 2017 @01:30AM (#13460281)

The executive branch has the power to unilaterally change the scheduling of prohibited drugs. Obama could have moved marijuana from a Schedule 1 to a Schedule 2 (or even 3) drug if he really wanted to. That would have made a huge difference.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Had My Electronics Seized by U.S. Customs and Border Pr... by sumedh on Monday January 23, 2017 @08:29AM (#13462009)

Republicans would have crucified him by yelling the black guy wants to give weed to your kids.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Had My Electronics Seized by U.S. Customs and Border Pr... by woofyman on Sunday January 22, 2017 @07:23PM (#13458652)

He may of been against marriage equality initially, but did command his justice department to not defend the defense of marriage act. Don't ask don't tell was repealed on his watch. He also allowed undocumented people who were brought to the USA as children (dreamers) to stay. His administration also ruled that title 9 applied to transgendered people.

Edit: His Justice Department also sued states over voter suppression and investigated racist police departments.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:I Had My Electronics Seized by U.S. Customs and Border Pr... by travmatt on Sunday January 22, 2017 @11:15PM (#13459708)

>The ACA was a disaster (of course it was, it was a zillion pages long, written by lobbyists, and few people read it before it was voted on), except for a few features such as coverage for pre-existing conditions.

I understand some broad facets of the law and I don't believe it was a disaster, and furthermore I suspect you don't understand it either - by what basis are you calling it a 'disaster'?

[ Parent | on HN ]