News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fake Physics by kmonad on Sunday January 22, 2017 @01:08PM (#13456292)
I think you misunderstand, what you are saying is my point. I argue that science, unlike the parent comment's claim, has not stagnated but made amazing progress. Yet, that when seeking to identify scientific progress by looking at new applications one might not arrive at a valid conclusion.
Re:Fake Physics by le-mark on Sunday January 22, 2017 @04:44PM (#13457716)
Why do others misunderstand? Maybe you say one thing and mean something else? It is clear you're arguing for the sake of arguing, and this community is worse off for it.
Re:Fake Physics by dekhn on Sunday January 22, 2017 @01:34PM (#13456419)
OK. I would say "discovery is stochastic", such that we do make amazing progress in a theoretical sense, although that progress doesn't seem to lead to tangible improvements.
Re:Fake Physics by kmonad on Sunday January 22, 2017 @01:53PM (#13456542)
Certainly our understanding of the world is improved, no? When you mean 'tangible' in the sense of 'solving a real world problem', i.e. an immediate application, then I feel this is getting a little circular. I simply reject the claim that one of the parent comments were making whereby science in general is not progressing. (edit: question mark)