News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fake Physics by parasubcutaneor on Saturday January 21, 2017 @04:36PM (#13452282)
At some point, I had considered the idea that after the invention of the atomic bomb, the cabal of scientists surrounding its discovery were asked to obfuscate further advancements, and seclude practical findings behind classified restrictions.

Many of the scienctists of that post war era were hounded mercilessly for decades ever after, throughout the cold war.

If one were to try and obfuscate a scientific field, and introduce enough confusion such that whirlpools of disagreement ensnare the casual hobbyist, how would that take shape?

Re:Fake Physics by Animats on Saturday January 21, 2017 @06:08PM (#13452615)
At some point, I had considered the idea that after the invention of the atomic bomb, the cabal of scientists surrounding its discovery were asked to obfuscate further advancements, and seclude practical findings behind classified restrictions.

Conspiracy theory: in the early days after the H-bomb, there was research into finding some way to make an H-bomb without needing an atomic bomb just to get the energy to start the thermonuclear reaction. This would have resulted in a "clean" H-bomb, and also the ability to make smaller ones. This research was unsuccessful.

Maybe it was really a success. Too much of a success, What if it became too easy to do? Perhaps progress in fusion is deliberately held up because there's a way to make an H-bomb that doesn't require an A-bomb.

Re:Fake Physics by bsder on Saturday January 21, 2017 @06:36PM (#13452729)
You might like Asimov's story "The Dead Past".
Re:Fake Physics by untoreh on Monday January 23, 2017 @03:02AM (#13460634)
Like majorana
Re:Fake Physics by plafl on Saturday January 21, 2017 @05:03PM (#13452380)
You have reminded me of this book (not actually read it): https://www.worldswithoutend.com/novel.asp?ID=12078