News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Magic Leap is neither magic nor leaping by Fricken on Saturday January 21, 2017 @10:37AM (#13450483)
Facebook bought Oculus for 2 billion, and what were they buying there? Oculus had a prototype cobbled together using off the shelf parts by a teenager in his garage, a successful kickstarter campaign, and John Carmack jumped on board.

And that made Oculus worth two thousand million dollars to Zuckerberg.

The acquisition sent a strong signal, though. Shortly afterwards a bevy of competitors, big and small, started throwing out offerings.

Maybe signalling is the only reason to make these outrageous investments. Google thinks AR is important, a massive bid on an early frontrunner can kickstart an arms race which generates talent and knowledge, and even if ML fails, so long as AR in general succeeds, a consumer tech company such as Google will be able to benefit from it.

Re:Magic Leap is neither magic nor leaping by moron4hire on Saturday January 21, 2017 @10:47AM (#13450532)
> The acquisition sent a strong signal, though. Shortly afterwards a bevy of competitors, big and small, started throwing out offerings.

In the case of the HTC Vive, given the timings of product development cycles and marketing campaigns, that was just a coincidence.

Re:Magic Leap is neither magic nor leaping by istorical on Saturday January 21, 2017 @01:38PM (#13451379)
They had a lot more than that at the time of acquisition.
Re:Magic Leap is neither magic nor leaping by maverick_iceman on Saturday January 21, 2017 @03:01PM (#13451774)
Huh, at first I thought ML means Machine Learning.