Re:Magic Leap is neither magic nor leaping
by moron4hire on Saturday January 21, 2017 @10:47AM
(#13450532)
> The acquisition sent a strong signal, though. Shortly afterwards a bevy of competitors, big and small, started throwing out offerings.
In the case of the HTC Vive, given the timings of product development cycles and marketing campaigns, that was just a coincidence.
Re:Magic Leap is neither magic nor leaping
by istorical on Saturday January 21, 2017 @01:38PM
(#13451379)
They had a lot more than that at the time of acquisition.
Re:Magic Leap is neither magic nor leaping
by maverick_iceman on Saturday January 21, 2017 @03:01PM
(#13451774)
Huh, at first I thought ML means Machine Learning.
And that made Oculus worth two thousand million dollars to Zuckerberg.
The acquisition sent a strong signal, though. Shortly afterwards a bevy of competitors, big and small, started throwing out offerings.
Maybe signalling is the only reason to make these outrageous investments. Google thinks AR is important, a massive bid on an early frontrunner can kickstart an arms race which generates talent and knowledge, and even if ML fails, so long as AR in general succeeds, a consumer tech company such as Google will be able to benefit from it.