Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination
by valbaca on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @06:20PM
(#13431440)
> Is "culture fit" illegal?
There's an argument to be said that it is a euphemism for discriminatory factors, along the lines of "shared values."
> Is that against the law?
Yes when you take contracts from the federal govt.
Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination
by kenjackson on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @07:51PM
(#13431979)
Actually, I think it's just against the law, period.
Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination
by euyyn on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @08:24PM
(#13432143)
IANAL, but place of origin is one of the protected categories, you can't even ask the candidate in an interview. So I would expect much less discriminate on purpose.
Also, "feeling like" someone's easier to work with sounds more like unconscious bias than reality. And if a company the size of Oracle would make hire/no-hire decisions based on such impressions, it'd be a sign that they have organizational problems.
Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination
by wenbert on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @05:52PM
(#13431203)
In New Zealand, we also have this thing called "Kiwi Experience". I think it's just an excuse to pay someone who is new to the country because they have no "Kiwi Experience".
Mind you, some or maybe even most immigrants (at least from my country) have at least 3+ years experience. Job experience means more points for Immigiration NZ.
Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination
by euyyn on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @08:25PM
(#13432149)
What if I just moved in, but I've eaten plenty of kiwis in my life?
Re:U.S. sues Oracle, alleges salary and hiring discrimination
by rconti on Wednesday January 18, 2017 @08:45PM
(#13432264)
Actually, Australia was the penal colony.
Let's say that an Indian manager hires more Indians because he feels like they are easier to work with. Now, he doesn't just hire Indians, but he is statistically more likely to do so over a large quantity of hires. Is that against the law?