Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M

Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M by jessaustin on Sunday January 15, 2017 @12:30PM (#13405100)

In NYC at least, robocars could just avoid the goofy streets, since the easily navigable streets are never that far away.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M by avn2109 on Sunday January 15, 2017 @01:10PM (#13405376)

What if your apartment is on a goofy street?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M by wutbrodo on Sunday January 15, 2017 @01:55PM (#13405643)

There's a whole spectrum from door-to-door taxi service to fixed-route public transit. I don't see why consumer expectations couldn't be set such that it's not weird to be dropped off a block or two away. Take a (more expensive) manned car if you need to be dropped at your door step. The same tradeoff id already at play with buses vs taxis/Uber.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M by morgante on Monday January 16, 2017 @10:33PM (#13415016)

Plus there's already a precedent in Uber Pool for something that's in between a bus and a taxi. They even will ask you to walk a short distance sometimes.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M by dripton on Sunday January 15, 2017 @01:50PM (#13405607)

Pickup / dropoff at nearest non-goofy intersection.

[ Parent | on HN ]