Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M
by coldcode on Sunday January 15, 2017 @10:49AM
(#13404489)
I have not seen autonomous cars drive in snow and ice and road construction on any regular basis. Until that works I can't imagine driverless cars anywhere except in good weather states.
Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M
by jessaustin on Sunday January 15, 2017 @12:30PM
(#13405100)
In NYC at least, robocars could just avoid the goofy streets, since the easily navigable streets are never that far away.
Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M
by avn2109 on Sunday January 15, 2017 @01:10PM
(#13405376)
What if your apartment is on a goofy street?
Re:Lyft Loses $600M in 2016 as Revenue Rises to $700M
by wutbrodo on Sunday January 15, 2017 @01:55PM
(#13405643)
There's a whole spectrum from door-to-door taxi service to fixed-route public transit. I don't see why consumer expectations couldn't be set such that it's not weird to be dropped off a block or two away. Take a (more expensive) manned car if you need to be dropped at your door step. The same tradeoff id already at play with buses vs taxis/Uber.
In my city there are many small streets with bad traffic and environment, that at least once a week I need to verbally negotiate with other drivers who goes first and who goes back. If all cars are autonomous, they may negotiate that; But if only half are, I don't see how this will work.
Most US cities have the benefit of being built for cars; But most European cities do not; and even in the NYC, there are weird small streets that often require negotiation among drivers.