Re:Guetzli JPEG encoder
by ZeroGravitas on Thursday January 12, 2017 @08:51AM
(#13382140)
Any thoughts on why they tuned for the 90-95 range? General rules of thumb you find on the internet would suggest mozJPEG is targetting a more useful sweet spot for serving images on the web.
Is it a limitation of their tool, or are they intending this for sorta-visually-lossless storage of photographs or something?
Is it a limitation of their tool, or are they intending this for sorta-visually-lossless storage of photographs or something?