News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by lqdc13 on Thursday January 12, 2017 @07:02AM (#13381588)
No secret chats in Telegram Desktop means its primary selling point is lost.
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by Al-Khwarizmi on Thursday January 12, 2017 @08:25AM (#13381971)
The encryption is often cited as its primary selling point here, but I don't think that's too representative. Certainly it isn't for me and most other Telegram users I know. I don't care much about that as I don't really trust any messaging app enough to send really confidential information through them.

For me, for example, he selling point is having an interface as slick as Whatsapp's, but not being tied to the phone, not having to necessarily give your phone number, sending whatever attachments you want, and getting a searchable log in the cloud.

Bots are also a popular feature with many users.

Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by mverwijs on Thursday January 12, 2017 @10:43AM (#13383064)
Telegram most certainly required me to enter mobile phone number. (Wouldn't even take a landline!)
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by Al-Khwarizmi on Thursday January 12, 2017 @04:50PM (#13386446)
Sorry, I didn't express myself too clearly. I meant that you can add contacts without giving them your phone number. You do have to give Telegram your number.
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by ParadoxOryx on Thursday January 12, 2017 @10:55AM (#13383184)
I think they are referring to the username functionality that Telegram has — https://telegram.org/faq#q-what-are-usernames-how-do-i-get-o...
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by reitanqild on Thursday January 12, 2017 @08:25AM (#13381968)
?

I - and I guess many with me - don't trust the encryption at all.

I assume the crypto might be broken, NSA and FSB and aliens might be listening but I don't care.

My reasons to use it:

Desktop support is way better than Whatsapp.

More possibilities (bots, channels mostly).

And because I don't want to support Whatsapp by being part of the network effect that keeps people on that platform.

The reasons I use private chats sometimes is just to use autodelete to protect my conversations with my wife against my kids.

Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by newscracker on Thursday January 12, 2017 @08:58AM (#13382185)
You should try Wire [1] for multi-device sync and multi-OS use that has all chats encrypted end-to-end (like secret chats). It's not yet on par with the Telegram speed and UX, but it's quite good.

[1]: https://wire.com

Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by notheguyouthink on Thursday January 12, 2017 @09:09AM (#13382261)
I'm confused, how are there no secret chats? I use them all the time from Desktop.. but maybe you mean Windows? I don't recall trying them from Windows - i use the OSX version.

Secret chats on OSX has the same UX as secret chats on my Android client, fwiw.

Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by Kipters on Thursday January 12, 2017 @10:53AM (#13383161)
You're probably using the Mac app. The post is about the Telegram Desktop cross-platform app, that doesn't support secret chats.
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0 by notheguyouthink on Thursday January 12, 2017 @12:21PM (#13384126)
Weird, so i guess for OSX they have two desktop clients. Such ambiguous wording. Thanks