Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
by hn159753 on Thursday January 12, 2017 @06:46AM
(#13381521)
Facebook Messenger.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Is Facebook Messenger Signal-based (i.e. end-to-end encrypted with a Signal/Axolotl double ratchet) as GP requested?
I somehow doubt it.
EDIT: Oh, I was mistaken, apparently there is an option now. From Wikipedia:
On October 4, 2016, Facebook deployed end-to-end encryption as an optional feature for Facebook Messenger users. It is available in an optional mode called "Secret Conversations" and uses the Signal Protocol.
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
by rand77763 on Thursday January 12, 2017 @07:04AM
(#13381603)
Wait, are you saying messenger is secure and private? As if Facebook would want to give up a source of data for marketing?
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
by tptacek on Thursday January 12, 2017 @08:29AM
(#13381999)
It's opt-in end-to-end encrypted with Signal Protocol now, so Facebook does in fact give up that data. Having said that, you should prefer protocols that aren't opt-in for security, which is what Signal buys you.
It's rather a web app than a desktop application, isn't it?
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
by hn159753 on Thursday January 12, 2017 @06:58AM
(#13381567)
It's not a desktop app, but the original requirement never stated that.
Re:Telegram Desktop reaches version 1.0
by akjainaj on Thursday January 12, 2017 @07:11AM
(#13381630)
There's a desktop app for Windows. There's also a web app at https://messenger.com. You can disable your Facebook account and still use Messenger