Darpa Goes “Meta” with Machine Learning for Machine Learning (2016)

Re:Darpa Goes “Meta” with Machine Learning for Machine Learn... by nicklovescode on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @03:05PM (#13368438)

Similarly, I think it's important to think of jobs in terms of behavior requirement rather than income levels.

For instance, it's well documented that radiologists are going to be one of the first jobs that suffer as a result of ML, due to it being image recognition.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Darpa Goes “Meta” with Machine Learning for Machine Learn... by Namrog84 on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @04:52PM (#13369455)

He didn't reference income levels. But that of education level. Education level isn't always correlated with income. Just look at a lot of PhD that don't make a ton compared to less "formally" educated

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Darpa Goes “Meta” with Machine Learning for Machine Learn... by fest on Wednesday January 11, 2017 @05:00AM (#13372879)

I was surprised to see that ECG test results are still analyzed/summarized manually[0]. I have seen ECG machines at hospitals try to summarize the test automatically but doctors don't seem to trust them and still manually analyze the result using measuring compass and specially graduated rulers.

It seems to me that the companies manufacturing these machines used pure signal processing techniques which don't give the results doctors are expecting.

0: http://www.ecglibrary.com/ecgs/norm.png

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Darpa Goes “Meta” with Machine Learning for Machine Learn... by sjg007 on Tuesday January 10, 2017 @08:12PM (#13370928)

Yes but it will be fought.. also radiology is also outsourced.

[ Parent | on HN ]