News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on PhantomJS 2.5.0 beta. Parent comment

Re:PhantomJS 2.5.0 beta by zlagen on Sunday January 08, 2017 @06:12PM (#13352681)
Casperjs, which runs on top of PhantomJS has been nicer to use for me. Also Nightmare(http://www.nightmarejs.org/). The problem I always had with PhantomJS is that it's more difficult than it should be to automatize very simple website interactions. In Nightmare's homepage you can see a comparison between a script made in PhantomJS and one in Nightmare.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PhantomJS 2.5.0 beta by fake-name on Sunday January 08, 2017 @07:59PM (#13353204)
NightmareJS isn't headless, which is a dealbreaker for me.

I'm automating in environments that don't have X.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PhantomJS 2.5.0 beta by jazoom on Monday January 09, 2017 @01:48AM (#13354526)
Yeah, that's the problem with Nightmare. It's great otherwise.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PhantomJS 2.5.0 beta by beobab on Monday January 09, 2017 @05:52AM (#13355418)
Witty comment about it being a Nightmare.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PhantomJS 2.5.0 beta by btrask on Sunday January 08, 2017 @07:54PM (#13353190)
These abstractions are building on top of sand.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:PhantomJS 2.5.0 beta by jazoom on Monday January 09, 2017 @01:48AM (#13354527)
Electron isn't sand.
[ Parent | on HN ]