News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The science of Westworld by EpicEng on Saturday January 07, 2017 @10:16AM (#13344485)
>while pretending to be sciency.

It's almost as though it's science fiction...

Re:The science of Westworld by rubber_duck on Saturday January 07, 2017 @11:12AM (#13344793)
Well I guess there are different kinds of science fiction - sci-fi that's obviously fiction and doesn't try to pretend to be realistic - Alien, Star Wars, etc. - I'm fine with this - it's just the author taking you in to his own fantasy world - just like Game of Thrones doesn't try to describe how dragons get to be aerodynamic or explain the white walkers superior strength by using dumbed down science.

Then there's Sci-Fi that's actually beleivable - like The Martian - I'm OK with this as well.

But then there's this pseudo-sciency trying to look serious while actually being BS part like Interstellar, The Arrival, etc. The main point of science there is not to be a fictional setting but trying to give a feeling of realism trough sci/techbabble. I don't even mind cheap sci-fi drama movies, for example I liked The Fountain, but when they try to pretend they are realistic that's what breaks the immersion for me completely because I start to critically evaluate the plot and it just falls apart.

Re:The science of Westworld by platz on Saturday January 07, 2017 @01:34PM (#13345727)
> trying to look serious while actually being BS

I think you missed the point entirely of the films you mentioned

Re:The science of Westworld by rubber_duck on Saturday January 07, 2017 @03:17PM (#13346370)
That's the point of SF in those movies. Remove SF elements and you're left with cheap dramas and cheesy themes (love beats everything yaay) - so they wrapped them in to SF elements and tried to make them look serious and deep with pseudoscience - which just annoys me and triggers me when people buy in to it :)
Re:The science of Westworld by platz on Saturday January 07, 2017 @03:26PM (#13346424)
:)