Research papers in the .NET source

Re:Research papers in the .NET source by bad_user on Friday January 06, 2017 @07:12PM (#13341534)

I don't really understand your reply. Where you replying to my comment?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Research papers in the .NET source by KirinDave on Friday January 06, 2017 @07:16PM (#13341548)

I'm saying that your idea that the JVM enables performance for dynamic langiagss, and then that's why the languages succeeded is wrong.

I also think it's wrong to imply IronPython and IronRuby failed for purely performance reasons.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Research papers in the .NET source by pjmlp on Saturday January 07, 2017 @03:20AM (#13342971)

Actually the JVM support for dynamic languages (invokedynamic) was only added after .NET, thanks to IronPython project, created the DLR first as a side project, then eventually released it as part of .NET 4.0.

I imagine only those of us that work regularly with both platforms get it right, when each got what, and even then it is easy to lose track.

[ Parent | on HN ]