News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by Retric on Friday January 06, 2017 @12:54PM (#13338431)
Would have loved, Sure. Would have done, No.
Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by hcoyote on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:00PM (#13338512)
The book took 8 years to make. He died in Oct 2011. He probably knew about it.
Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by Retric on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:35PM (#13338885)
The problem is not the book, the problem is the pricing for the book which he had nothing to do with.

At 30$ or 300$ the company is not going to get meaningful revenue, or likely enough to pay the cost of production back. So, the pricing needs to relate to something else.

Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by jonknee on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:39PM (#13338934)
The point of the book wasn't to juice the "Other revenue" line in their quarterly report, it was to produce a high-end art book of their design work. It actually makes more sense as a high dollar item considering that allows it to be made with high quality materials and become a collectors item. At $30 it would probably be junk, uninteresting to collectors/designers and the mass market alike.
Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by Retric on Friday January 06, 2017 @02:48PM (#13339562)
The argument is they could use the same materials and sell it for 30$. At 300$ they are already going to be out millions. So, the difference in price is just not going to be meaningful until they start selling 30,000+ copies.

The bugatti veyron for example sells for ~$1.5 million, but it costs more than twice that to make ($6.25 million). However, as VW only sold ~50 veyron's per year it's was just not an issue for VW compared to the 10.14 million cars they sold per year.

Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by jonknee on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:07PM (#13338576)
I don't have a time machine, but why do you think he wouldn't have done the book? He was responsible for the ridiculous 20th Anniversary Mac ($7499 in 1997!):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twentieth_Anniversary_Macintos...

That's a way bigger time/money sink than allowing your designers to put together an art book of Apple products.

Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by pg314 on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:20PM (#13338714)
I don't think he was responsible for the 20th Anniversary Mac, which was released in March 1997. Apple bought NeXT in february 1997, and Jobs only be became de facto chief of Apple after Amelio was ousted in July 1997.
Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by jonknee on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:36PM (#13338892)
That's fair, but I still think he would have loved the book and quite well may have known about it or even approved it.
Re:Apple cuts Tim Cook's pay 15% for missing sales goals by empthought on Friday January 06, 2017 @01:25PM (#13338777)
Is it, though? It had to have been one of Ive's first projects at Apple, and you can't get good industrial design without putting stuff into the hands of users. Who knows how much collective knowledge and experience Apple internally acquired with that work.

As far as a consumer product or a moneymaker, yeah, it's crap.