Re:Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice (2014)
by necessity on Friday January 06, 2017 @05:02AM
(#13335155)
There is some discussion on porting Pentadactyl/Vimperator and on alternatives that support Electrolysis here: https://github.com/5digits/dactyl/issues/99
Re:Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice (2014)
by lcbiazon on Friday January 06, 2017 @05:30AM
(#13335300)
It's a shame. What I did is installing VimFX, that is e10s ready, and stick around using for some weeks, trying to reproduce the same workflow I have for years with vimperator.
It's a pain at first, but I got used to it and now I don't have to care if vimperator/pentadactyl will be ported or not.
Re:Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice (2014)
by wz1000 on Friday January 06, 2017 @06:20AM
(#13335486)
IIRC, even the architecture VimFX is built on is planned to be obsolete by the end of the year.
Re:Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice (2014)
by hvis on Friday January 06, 2017 @07:35AM
(#13335813)
Its main developer, however, is looking into implementing the necessary WebExtensions API: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1215061
Re:Choose Firefox Now, Or Later You Won't Get A Choice (2014)
by Sylos on Friday January 06, 2017 @05:45AM
(#13335371)
I don't know what the current state of the implementation is, but Mozilla definitely does have plans to add APIs to the WebExtensions-standard to allow the implementation of add-ons like Vimperator.
I don't know what I'm going to be using, but I'm very interested in qutebrowser. The dev is active and has shown interest in adding support for WebExtensions to the browser.