Re:Deepest X-ray Image Ever Reveals Black Hole Treasure Trove
by latchkey on Friday January 06, 2017 @02:47AM
(#13334614)
For some reason, 7 million seconds sounds a lot better than eleven and a half weeks when talking about black holes and deep space observations.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Deepest X-ray Image Ever Reveals Black Hole Treasure Trove
by cardiffspaceman on Friday January 06, 2017 @12:16PM
(#13338071)
If you wanted to strip away local Earth culture baggage, you would want to avoid using minutes, hours, days, weeks, months and years, as these relate to Earth's movements. But I am not a working astronomer so I don't know if that's the motive.
Re:Deepest X-ray Image Ever Reveals Black Hole Treasure Trove
by non_repro_blue on Friday January 06, 2017 @05:30AM
(#13335294)
... or "roughly three months" for that matter.
I wonder, in the final days and hours, what the amount of impact individual seconds have on a given image.
Do the sensors record the full stream of data, and then perform calculations to produce the exposure?
If so, how many bytes does one pixel-second occupy? How high is the dynamic range for x-rays? Figure maybe a sensor can operate like a high-speed camera, and record many hundreds of frames per second?