Re:Myths about /dev/urandom (2014)
by rconti on Friday January 06, 2017 @02:31AM
(#13334564)
I, too, found it INCREDIBLY difficult to read. Perhaps because I don't have much understanding of random-number generators, but I had to re-read the first handful of entries about 3 times before I could catch on. I think a big part of it was my tendency to read the BOLD statements as the facts. Then when it said FACT beneath it, I had to start all over again.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.