News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:105-Year-Old Cyclist Rides 14 Miles in an Hour En Route t... by hahamrfunnyguy on Thursday January 05, 2017 @03:48PM (#13331244)
Makes sense. The heart wouldn't need to be as strong to circulate blood, and by extension not need to be as large or need as much nourishment either.
Re:105-Year-Old Cyclist Rides 14 Miles in an Hour En Route t... by rubicon33 on Thursday January 05, 2017 @04:39PM (#13331670)
What I don't understand about this theory, is, that you would then expect athletes of all sizes to die sooner... Certainly the heart of an athlete has gone a lifetime working harder than a non athlete... Maybe I'm misunderstanding something about the height/age correlation...
Re:105-Year-Old Cyclist Rides 14 Miles in an Hour En Route t... by steinystein on Thursday January 05, 2017 @04:53PM (#13331768)
My guess, is your misunderstanding lies in biology in general. There is no constant maximum heart effort per lifetime. The heart is a muscle, if muscles are not used they become weak, conversely when muscles are used they become stronger and can grow (see: weight lifting). Also there is more to staying alive than a heart that beats.
Re:105-Year-Old Cyclist Rides 14 Miles in an Hour En Route t... by Fnoord on Thursday January 05, 2017 @03:52PM (#13331276)
Humans shrink in size as they grow older as well.
Re:105-Year-Old Cyclist Rides 14 Miles in an Hour En Route t... by nl on Thursday January 05, 2017 @10:17PM (#13333631)
That may make sense, but appears to be mostly wrong.

The linked paper doesn't draw conclusions (it's just a survey paper), but does point to studies showing a positive correlation between cancer, rapid growth, and height.