Hands on with the First Open Source Microcontroller

Re:Hands on with the First Open Source Microcontroller by rootlocus on Thursday January 05, 2017 @03:35PM (#13331118)

> I will simply link to the Nirvana fallacy and ask them to point me to a microcontroller that is more Free and Open Source.

What? To me this reads like: "Here's a pink unicorn! If you argue it's a brown horse with a cardboard corn I dare you to show me a horse that is more unicorn!". Is it open source or not?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hands on with the First Open Source Microcontroller by georgemcbay on Thursday January 05, 2017 @04:06PM (#13331397)

It is an open system that includes a closed component (FTDI FT2232HL chip).

Open Source (software) equivalent would be something like a Linux distribution that is generally fully open source but relies on a binary blob driver for the videocard... Is it still "open source"? Yes, mostly, but not 100% fully.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hands on with the First Open Source Microcontroller by 31h on Thursday January 05, 2017 @04:36PM (#13331645)

That's pretty cool if the only closed source part is a USB-UART IC. Not much secret sauce there; I bet if you wanted to be pure you could implement that function on a second FE310 with software bit-banging.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hands on with the First Open Source Microcontroller by joezydeco on Thursday January 05, 2017 @07:23PM (#13332793)

So whack it off the board and add a MAX232 driver and a DB9 connector?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hands on with the First Open Source Microcontroller by baobrien on Thursday January 05, 2017 @10:58PM (#13333805)

I think they're using the FT2232H for JTAG as well as serial, so you'd have to do a bit more than replacing the serial port.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Hands on with the First Open Source Microcontroller by 5ilv3r on Thursday January 05, 2017 @04:03PM (#13331366)

The core is. The product is not.

[ Parent | on HN ]