News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:‘Artificial Intelligence’ Was the Fake News of 2016 by eva1984 on Monday January 02, 2017 @11:14AM (#13301942)
Wrong on so many levels. If AI has been well-researched in 90s, why it is DL that really pushes the boundary of several essential tasks, namely image/speech recognition, machine translation to near human performance?

I am curious about your definition of 'AI' that seems only obvious to the term 'Artificial'.

Re:‘Artificial Intelligence’ Was the Fake News of 2016 by lngnmn on Monday January 02, 2017 @12:08PM (#13302445)
> namely image/speech recognition, machine translation to near human performance?

The key word here is recognition. Better, faster, more efficient classifiers.

The algorithms for training a better representation of the features, not just features itself is a big deal, but it is, again, supervised learning.

The adversary approach, which gives additional feedback for better training, is mere sophisticated supervised learning.

Take one of the best papers survey (which is an emergent new genre in hipster's blogs) and one will see that there is nothing fundamentally new, apart from sophistication and additional feedback.

Re:‘Artificial Intelligence’ Was the Fake News of 2016 by eva1984 on Monday January 02, 2017 @12:25PM (#13302625)
While if you consider that human achieves intelligence through a lot of supervision(homework and exams) too, I won't go directly to disclaim only unsupervised learning can be hailed as the king.

In fact, there is a discussion about the definition of unsupervised learning, because of the emergence of techniques like word2vec, where it essentially supervised learning but construct all its tasks from the data itself without any labelling.

Re:‘Artificial Intelligence’ Was the Fake News of 2016 by p1esk on Monday January 02, 2017 @01:06PM (#13303000)
You do realize that main DL ideas have been developed in the 90s, or even earlier?

CNNs, RNNs, LSTMs, reinforcement learning, gradient descent, backpropagation - all that was used in the 90s, but given the limited computing power they had, people simply couldn't run large enough models on large enough data to get results.

Re:‘Artificial Intelligence’ Was the Fake News of 2016 by eva1984 on Monday January 02, 2017 @03:06PM (#13303986)
Without development of technique like Dropout Batch normalization, residual connection, better optimizer like Adam, even with enough data and computational power, DL won't be nearly as powerful as it is today.