Playing Devil's advocate, what if one simply votes based on what's going on around them? Not reading the news doesn't imply you're secluded from the rest of society, especially if one uses the free time to make an effort to take a more active interest outside of one's bubble.

Takes 5 minutes of skimming campaign sites and the first page of google results, tops, to pick the least-horrible candidate among the (if you're lucky) two viable ones for a given election at the state or national level in the US, assuming you haven't picked up enough by cultural osmosis to make the decision with no further effort.

Local elections are a different matter, but closely following state and national policy and politics is a fairly useless hobby (so it's fine to do so if you enjoy it!) for most people, unless they plan to get much more seriously involved in the process than voting and maybe stuffing envelopes for someone. Or if they have some kind of need for deep knowledge of that stuff for business reasons, I guess, but few have such a need.

Personally, I keep up with the news, but I understand the author's position. The news is mostly depressing stuff I can't do anything about or it reads like an editorial piece that I'm left wondering what the truth is.