Re:Yitang “Tom” Zhang and fame in mathematics
by pmiller2 on Friday December 30, 2016 @08:42PM
(#13288934)
It actually sounds like the "having published no papers" bit was the primary reason he wasn't able to get a job. Not having an advisor recommendation is not a good sign, but it's hard to argue with published work.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Yitang “Tom” Zhang and fame in mathematics
by justicezyx on Friday December 30, 2016 @09:21PM
(#13289061)
I don't think a PhD can get any interview for academic jobs at all without adviser's reference letter.
It's worse than no publications.
Re:Yitang “Tom” Zhang and fame in mathematics
by argonaut on Friday December 30, 2016 @09:10PM
(#13289028)
True, but it's not unheard of for math PhD's to graduate with no refereed publications (certainly they'll have a thesis), so it really was the lack of his advisor's recommendation that killed his career.
Re:Yitang “Tom” Zhang and fame in mathematics
by ithinkinstereo on Friday December 30, 2016 @08:52PM
(#13288966)
That's a valid point. I know in Mathematics quality seems to trump quantity but having _no_ articles certainly didn't do him any favors.
But the lack of LORs... that would be a scarlet letter, no? I've never heard of a PHD advisor doing that; seems quite intentional and not at all like the way he presents it in his little essay I linked in my last post.
Re:Yitang “Tom” Zhang and fame in mathematics
by mikebenfield on Saturday December 31, 2016 @02:25AM
(#13289982)
Publication rates in mathematics are much lower than in other fields, so the lack of publications isn't completely unusual. The lack of a letter from the advisor though would be seen as a major red flag.