Re:Ask HN: Would you wait a day for less biased, more reliab...
by awgme on Friday December 30, 2016 @05:53PM
(#13288222)
That was what we had in mind! I guess instead of saying we're trying to be "less biased", we should be focusing on "what both left and right-wing leaning news are saying", as long as the information is correct.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Would you wait a day for less biased, more reliab...
by joeclark77 on Friday December 30, 2016 @10:17PM
(#13289250)
The problem with that is that in most cases, one of the two of you will be more talented and get more traffic, resulting in the other guy getting flamed by commenters, etc. For example Sean Hannity's show used to be "Hannity and Colmes", one right-wing and one left-wing commentator, and poor Mr. Colmes was just outnumbered and outgunned to the point that he quit.
Re:Ask HN: Would you wait a day for less biased, more reliab...
by bryanrasmussen on Saturday December 31, 2016 @03:29AM
(#13290140)
It might achieve some popularity but the difficulty of determining correctness or bias or other things without bringing your own bias to the problem will of course mean that the stated goal is not what will actually be the end result.
Re:Ask HN: Would you wait a day for less biased, more reliab...
by brudgers on Friday December 30, 2016 @06:17PM
(#13288364)
Curious what would be considered left leaning and right leaning and whether or not an "equal time" approach might reflect a bias.
Re:Ask HN: Would you wait a day for less biased, more reliab...
by codeddesign on Monday January 02, 2017 @05:58PM
(#13305245)
Correct...The only way around this that I see would be to allow voting in which the crowd would decide if the article would be in the correct column or not.