News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Female founders who've had a great 2016 by dang on Monday December 26, 2016 @05:23PM (#13260100)
> Where is the Male only founder conference?

Sorry, but this is off-topic because it predictably leads to tedium (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13241873). It also breaks the site guidelines, which ask you not to do classic flamewar topics on HN (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html).

We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13259484 and marked it off-topic.

Re:Female founders who've had a great 2016 by DrDimension on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @11:54AM (#13264215)
You know, Dang, this whole thread is a flame war topic. Why didn't you delete that? Oh, I know why, because it supports your side of the ideological narrative.

All people are asking is that you apply your own rules to your own selves. It should be obvious by now that these double standards do not make for community harmony.

Re:Female founders who've had a great 2016 by dang on Tuesday December 27, 2016 @04:08PM (#13266190)
It's a matter of degree. The OP has flamebait aspects, but it also has substantive, on-topic material. Obviously we're not going to treat all such stories as off-topic just because some people make flamewars out of them. If we did that, people could kill any story just by flaming enough.

"Blah blah blah what about nurses fuck you", on the other hand (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13241873), has no merit as a subtopic at all—not after the number of times we've all endured it. I trust that most HN readers understand that when we make a call like this, it isn't about ideology, but about not subjecting the community to tedium.

> your side of the ideological narrative

We hear this often enough from a minority of readers who feel strongly about ideology. However, it varies (quite reliably in fact) with the ideology of the beholder. To me that seems like evidence of cognitive bias at work, since it's same body of moderation decisions being interpreted in conflicting ways.