Re:Writing web applications using only the Go Standard Library
by amenghra on Friday December 23, 2016 @11:42PM
(#13248610)
Give Squalor (https://github.com/square/squalor) a shot.
You might find https://github.com/relops/sqlc really nice from an API design point of view (inspird by jOOQ, a Java sql library).
Sqlc is no longer under development, but you can easily use it as a reference to adapt other libraries to have a similar API.
Re:Writing web applications using only the Go Standard Library
by notheguyouthink on Friday December 23, 2016 @08:36PM
(#13248160)
I literally found out about sqlx a few moments before coming here. I was stringing together ~10 columns by hand, and then when i fed them into the `row.Scan()` method, i just about rage quit. On Monday i'm going to try integrating sqlx and see how i like it.
Any other good sql libs i should know about? My coworkers mostly like sql by hand, so no magic ORMs preferably. But unmarshalling rows seems like an absolute requirement.. this is just anarchy without it.
Re:Writing web applications using only the Go Standard Library
by bitexploder on Friday December 23, 2016 @09:01PM
(#13248224)
Gorm. Give it a try. Light on magic. Can write by hand easily still. If you arent writing really complex queries and are just shuffling records around Gorm makes life a joy. It is no SQL alchemy but for most SQL users ORM/SRM makes life better. Anyway I think most systems using SQL in business logic end up implementing a relational mapper, just not as well as battle tested mappers. But some use cases do justify avoiding such tools.
http://www.gorillatoolkit.org/pkg/mux
https://github.com/jmoiron/sqlx