The State of Linux Security

Re:The State of Linux Security by pjmlp on Friday December 23, 2016 @09:37AM (#13244894)

QNX, Genode and L4 have solved that problem longtime ago.

The problems with microkernels are mostly urban legends.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The State of Linux Security by dispose13432 on Friday December 23, 2016 @01:22PM (#13246326)

So why can't hurd get its act together?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The State of Linux Security by snvzz on Monday December 26, 2016 @12:46PM (#13259037)

Because they're still using Mach, and most capable contributors moved on to microkernel-based projects that actually aren't hopeless.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The State of Linux Security by pmoriarty on Friday December 23, 2016 @04:32PM (#13247327)

Lack of volunteers.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The State of Linux Security by pjmlp on Friday December 23, 2016 @03:08PM (#13246935)

Lack of resources and manpower.

[ Parent | on HN ]