Re:The best of JavaScript Weekly in 2016
by tdumitrescu on Thursday December 22, 2016 @11:34AM
(#13238325)
And yet it is actually extremely content-rich, with a very good signal-to-noise ratio. For a free product whose only monetization scheme appears to be dev job ads and clearly-marked sponsored technical posts, it is really quite useful to have in my inbox every week. I also find myself browsing the archives not infrequently, and the generally no-frills UI makes it much easier to use for that purpose than most fancy custom content UIs. HTTP+HTML are already _quite good_ for browsing hyperlinked textual content.
Re:The best of JavaScript Weekly in 2016
by petercooper on Thursday December 22, 2016 @11:41AM
(#13238379)
Thank you, that's very kind. If you have suggestions, please do just reply to an issue. We're improving the sites substantially for next year, but don't worry, no JS frameworks will get involved, all plain and fast HTML (just a better layout).
Re:The best of JavaScript Weekly in 2016
by simooooo on Thursday December 22, 2016 @06:38PM
(#13241485)
I should say I am also a subscriber, I'm not trying to shit on the contents. Literally the combo of underlined main link then the paragraph underneath and the author in lighter grey looks just like a Google ad/dodgy search engine.
Re:The best of JavaScript Weekly in 2016
by petercooper on Thursday December 22, 2016 @11:21AM
(#13238241)
Our archive pages are, yeah, not great :) Being redesigned for the new year. We are "email first" and most of the page is the raw HTML straight from the email. However, we hand curate for many hours every week and have been doing so for six years now, so you can trust this isn't just some random bundle of links (essentially, they're the ones most clicked in issues this year).
Not everything needs a hero image and cards.
I don't see anything wrong with their UI. It really helps people focus on the content.