News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber stops self-driving pilot in SF after DMV revokes its... by andy_ppp on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @11:35PM (#13234839)
If I as a business do something illegal but it is very useful to consumers, governments seem to accept it over worker rights for a long time. Similarly, it seems taxes are optional (corp/vat) if you employ lots of people.

I'm not sure about Uber as a company, but I am very sure that changing laws (AirBnB/Uber/Deliveroo/others) has been good for me and this should be the first thought in a startup rather than let's not bother because it seems to be illegal or I have to register as a bank (it's always a bank with the ideas I come up with...) to be allowed to do X. It's probably easier to break the law and ask forgiveness than mire yourself in regulation before you have customers...

I'd love to hear YCs take on this but as ever you only get their advice if you are in the club. Also they probably can't advocate doing illegal things (publicly anyway).

Re:Uber stops self-driving pilot in SF after DMV revokes its... by WalterSear on Thursday December 22, 2016 @02:15AM (#13235506)
It's not about being good to consumers. It's about lobbyists, money and power.
Re:Uber stops self-driving pilot in SF after DMV revokes its... by andy_ppp on Thursday December 22, 2016 @02:45AM (#13235639)
Is there any way to prove either way it's definitely corrupt or does it just seem that way? I'm likely to agree, but you know someone would have piped up and argued the opposite if I had have said corruption yada yada... To be fair, globalisation has been brilliant for me, the lobbyists, Apple and hundreds of millions pulled out of poverty worldwide. And it's destroyed the climate, the environment and hope for even more people, some even throwing themselves off the side of foxcon plants.

It's very difficult to say how corrupt a system actually is but there must be some research into it.