News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by mandelbulb on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @06:35PM (#13233588)
Make Vimperator great again - still no support. :'(

Two year old github issue but yet any development to be seen or reported :/

Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by wsha on Thursday December 22, 2016 @12:30AM (#13235094)
Sadly it's not realistic. Even if someone were to put in the time to make it work, Vimperator would just break again within the next year when XUL addons are deprecated in favor of WebExtensions, and unfortunately WebExtensions do not support all the features of Vimperator. You can use VimFx for now, but again it is a XUL addon and would take a massive amount of work to port to a WebExtension. Hopefully someone can get Vimium or cVim ported over as a WebExtension. I have played around some with this but haven't got it to work. It seems some of the needed API's are missing from WebExtensions at the moment.
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by pmoriarty on Friday December 23, 2016 @04:23PM (#13247288)
Pentadactyl is also going to break then, for the same reason. That's why I've been moving from Firefox to Pale Moon, where Pentadactyl continues to work. I expect Vimperator will continue to work on Pale Moon too.
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by lorenzfx on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @07:19PM (#13233792)
You know what they say, pull requests are the new feature requests...

But yeah, I'd love to see vimperator or pentadactyl supporting this, and no, I neither have the time nor the skillset to fix it myself.

Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by regecks on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @10:31PM (#13234538)
Try Vimfx, I switched to take advantage of e10s, and it's been worthwhile.
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by Ar-Curunir on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @10:06PM (#13234441)
VimFX has been a more than capable substitute.
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by proaralyst on Thursday December 22, 2016 @07:52AM (#13236917)
I just took a gander: no tab-search, the keybindings are closer to Vimium than plain vim and no external editor. Also the hinting is _slow_ - it takes a second to render the link hints on the hacker news home page.

How are you dealing with all of that?

Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by Ar-Curunir on Thursday December 22, 2016 @10:57AM (#13238088)
To be honest the only thing I miss is tab search; you can modify the keybindings as you wish. I don't use hints as much as I used to.

Maybe my browsing style has changed; more reading and less clicking.

Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by wsha on Friday December 23, 2016 @05:22PM (#13247521)
I have been testing out VimFx as well (long time Pentadactyl user). I miss being able to do ":b" and quickly find open tabs, but the Firefox awesomebar has a similar functionality if you type "%". That's what I have been using. You can see more information here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/awesome-bar-search-fire...
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by fra on Wednesday December 21, 2016 @09:00PM (#13234203)
At this point I think it's either fix it yourself or look elsewhere :(. I don't think the current maintainers have the bandwidth to port it to WebExtensions.
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by hashhar on Thursday December 22, 2016 @05:03AM (#13236200)
Check out VimFX. It is a very capable substitute.
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by Gonzih on Thursday December 22, 2016 @05:11AM (#13236236)
How does it compare to Pentadactyl? I heavily use pendacatyl scripting functionality to do shelling out from firefox.
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by wsha on Friday December 23, 2016 @05:27PM (#13247539)
It lacks many features of Pentadactyl but covers the basics -- clicking links and text boxes with the keyboard. I have found it possible to replicate some of the things I missed from Pentadactyl through built-in features of Firefox I didn't know about (like the awesomebar filters I linked to above). Also, from using VimFx and accidentally hitting ":", i discovered the GCLI. It is a little clunky, but it is possible to define custom commands for the GCLI that have similar access to Firefox as XUL addons (and I think the GCLI is supposed to survive through WebExtensions).
Re:Update on Multi-Process Firefox by hashhar on Friday December 23, 2016 @09:04AM (#13244725)
I can't say about Pentadactyl but I do think it is a good enough replacement for Vimperator. Sorry.