But note that OoTheNigerian's comment eventually became upvoted (hugely upvoted in fact). That community correction often happens when comments are unfairly downvoted—but it takes a little while.
I didn't see the comments that you erased, but based on many things you've posted in the past, I'm sure they were in good faith and driven by concern for the quality of HN, which is something we appreciate even in the rare case of a misfire.
The person spoke about him using a feature he thought Twitter should have. Tweetstorms.
From far away Nigeria (you may know it as Africa;)) we built something that filled the need and the head of product at twitter using it is the biggest endorsement one can get.
Of course, I could have chosen to be more elaborate in my comment and be like minimaxir but sometimes few words are better.
I am excited and i let it out.
I didn't read it as sarcastic and if people were talking about tweetstorms and I found out my tool was used to build it, I'm sure it is not irrelevant to point it out.
You would get my point if you tried building something and had it used.
It seems you have carried on with your monitoring behaviour from Techcrunch comment days.
You can downvote and go in peace but please quit your lecture.
Thanks.