Re:Can Programming Be Liberated from the von Neumann Style? ...
by godmodus on Monday December 19, 2016 @11:05AM
(#13212262)
If it's written spartan style, yes. If you go nuts with its dark corners things do get wierd. It's why it's a hard labour to write safely - and a contributing reason to JVM success.
It's the mother of all, and abusing it in ways that make it unpredictable is more than likely.
Re:Can Programming Be Liberated from the von Neumann Style? ...
by kahnpro on Monday December 19, 2016 @02:30PM
(#13214276)
If you have to add that qualifier, then is it really a predictable like language?
Re:Can Programming Be Liberated from the von Neumann Style? ...
by godmodus on Monday December 19, 2016 @03:32PM
(#13214752)
I don't see a problem with proper use of qualifiers.
It has to be said that I'm a "right tool for the job" kind of man, and spend less time worrying about the perfect-ness of a language. Can't think of a better language to write crypto/network routing code with. Though a colleague did implement some mDNS craziness with java.
Don't shoot me. Heh.
Really?